livelog 52,079 entries · root 31dfc21059c3 · read 12:10:39
the record/entry 50444
DENY
refused before it reached the network
op 0 pays GDUTWRB57ZRMJPEBNMPHTZXP7FINUBD4SM5WEPSRFDP75Y7SSEKDG2YG, which is not in the allowlist
decided in 7.769ms2026-09-16 09:38:46
why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed

op 0 pays GDUTWRB57ZRMJPEBNMPHTZXP7FINUBD4SM5WEPSRFDP75Y7SSEKDG2YG, which is not in the allowlist

post_approval_integritydefinition_changed_since_approval

the tool or contract definition fingerprinted a3f1c0de9b7452e8 when the human approved and fingerprints 77b2e4901ac6df35 now. the approval covers something that no longer exists

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
0c1e9fb7e1f80e6dd2041c15b9bc03a4e16b1c019c013daf0b075c2c32ec1130
request
b6ebd2f8640fcfc81dea9f62f784871c85d18e9f4aab0c4892734282bfe51660
transaction
d2eb48320672441512985984ef890cc69aebcebea00f97bb81c774633630daba
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 50444
recomputing…
the chainentry 50444
sealed to the entry before
06c68ae81d24a552279d5a156969ae28a7943719a8cb4d1f7f424f606a81ac96
this leaf
3f0f6ac6fe37cbd00a49a18fbfd52521cfb5400ea2a62ee3938c37a34916aca3
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
zAHtnzFBv7v6Y3ERNj52GvUB9PIXK0R4EhRfaCH003bhoc5sAxpDV27p4hXq/BR8lkm3tbqc1fK4bI+99H2+BA==