livelog 49,127 entries · root e38744de3715 · read 12:10:46
the record/entry 49024
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GCVTBUN4TB2JKTR5JHNREBIRNJAUQ5GHJ7CQBB7XKR4MKLXDJ6YV5VT4 to 108 over the last 60000ms, above the 90 window cap, with 78 already spent
decided in 7.803ms2026-09-15 10:25:23
why1 reason
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GCVTBUN4TB2JKTR5JHNREBIRNJAUQ5GHJ7CQBB7XKR4MKLXDJ6YV5VT4 to 108 over the last 60000ms, above the 90 window cap, with 78 already spent

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
9a1c65a13b0b15340189d2dad38c34e79b87d37cee937961b1c0b2e7213ae13e
request
94dd5db3a4d4f24b690ef42f764ef4281ec88fb47218f83b3413090ad5b5e246
transaction
9c5faa2526bd8bc95f73fad7a145b370b63b3c5860fb9938bb4caa76da81d632
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 49024
recomputing…
the chainentry 49024
sealed to the entry before
bd7cd8f2f903af9c123548f57a08b1d7209567bd736c9af16fe06fdfb6b7f4f3
this leaf
41b2bc1f3e0b0d24dc200d73f6bc1f7619313ab694654294efc367d1db77912b
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
SFi6nVz1AUm8i5hJjCoVaXA5JHhcH2Ir/uvvUJLsOU401lggsGBGExcRZduZKFJxOdAjPfrf3W6recGRUQBYBg==