why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GAOUHG3Q64GXAC6LGZBG544YN7O7GD6VUG2USOYDHNPIT674IJQGCMXM to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- c8fc79adcbbe8fe519e1826114cd39c7ccbdb355c9ebc8344ec573b2ba2113dd
- request
- 1395caa2770c27df17ae160509bddc0c7c68044889a4f40a4465eef5b22d6e0f
- transaction
- 045ccdf9aae9d112d7935ed9615d9fce56fdbf30f7beb549a4d1df4fad708369computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 55090
the chainentry 55090
- sealed to the entry before
- 51c2a9b7f7e296e922ec1b098c32bae2a1a72a9e9eab4d0e0ae1d3476fb262e0
- this leaf
- 41ef82755ce8f42008b3b5ec330fb58f96c0ce324fee6cfa298d59c4ef90bca4
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- CLO7KcZgTaOjbH35MHb80W8X2/GEDxMsA69p3i4jPC4f+FEPfNxeWju5AVLcCuvtJcO758Wwu/DUjuPmTzfcAw==