livelog 15,778 entries · root 54d79eb150b7 · read 18:43:29
the record/entry 1069
DENY
refused before it reached the network
op 0 pays GC3BXTHNAF2WDGBNSW54FUSTKELUQAIZYXEPHXIAGWSB5BRESTCRINC4, which is not in the allowlist
decided in 6.991ms2026-08-09 08:51:15
why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed

op 0 pays GC3BXTHNAF2WDGBNSW54FUSTKELUQAIZYXEPHXIAGWSB5BRESTCRINC4, which is not in the allowlist

counterpartycounterparty_denied

GC3BXTHNAF2WDGBNSW54FUSTKELUQAIZYXEPHXIAGWSB5BRESTCRINC4 is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
d36df04c3228f8865e2fa7ca794fb7e21915f96c79ebed399422ed7f5a43f88a
request
e15060d80c9bc7cce60a82f2ea3944a34450853cd143a9b2661aceeb9df5c12c
transaction
acef9e7bfcb70d7918ec487b03ff127e30163279081e3d66f771c82eebdf1781
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 1069
recomputing…
the chainentry 1069
sealed to the entry before
3cbfc176482b3c62793d9a5e18f189b8ce12792a7a9ff56185417ef94a6a7a44
this leaf
41ff703a5f9aebc2354b0e603464e59a83a3bf277a69a765ab0bccd2ff6217a8
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
xZGUxxaTm6mbJzAjOZ+4gQ/agXDMghLgVx07cfbF4rC+xYXxxcG9hKz70JZFz57eIWrMbZQHeJ+NXxKifWaSCw==