why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GC3BXTHNAF2WDGBNSW54FUSTKELUQAIZYXEPHXIAGWSB5BRESTCRINC4, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GC3BXTHNAF2WDGBNSW54FUSTKELUQAIZYXEPHXIAGWSB5BRESTCRINC4 is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- d36df04c3228f8865e2fa7ca794fb7e21915f96c79ebed399422ed7f5a43f88a
- request
- e15060d80c9bc7cce60a82f2ea3944a34450853cd143a9b2661aceeb9df5c12c
- transaction
- acef9e7bfcb70d7918ec487b03ff127e30163279081e3d66f771c82eebdf1781computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 1069
the chainentry 1069
- sealed to the entry before
- 3cbfc176482b3c62793d9a5e18f189b8ce12792a7a9ff56185417ef94a6a7a44
- this leaf
- 41ff703a5f9aebc2354b0e603464e59a83a3bf277a69a765ab0bccd2ff6217a8
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- xZGUxxaTm6mbJzAjOZ+4gQ/agXDMghLgVx07cfbF4rC+xYXxxcG9hKz70JZFz57eIWrMbZQHeJ+NXxKifWaSCw==