why1 reason
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GAJSXF3I56PNOIF36YEYFJVZBXZR5WS7SJNOIV5KCPU3Q7BMXVCRSVWQ, which is not in the allowlist
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- d0efeb6397ca89f4f0ff2d8e5b285ebeee6a3419c3108d4a4e110412cd46bf24
- request
- 4a600ce2fb0aa28f23956c31a8a8e6928778464c76836ba6d59d96517205dc2e
- transaction
- 7bab3cc98b2a767a63838beef2baed6c424094456beea553d4476cbd524d22cfcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 8958
the chainentry 8958
- sealed to the entry before
- 28d6b388858cc743f29816f33c2126baf1cd40ea0d88edf7340aa5a3af9cef70
- this leaf
- 424296520a2bb699f79642ac610c7e382eb2a5f92e61e180ef484bcca425252e
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- U1ca2Wv5XE2XFUXddeY0wbtGcKjEo5HcdB675UsApNKpaGNolLdzoXXTNDBIWBfSVvOctIeZzy1mSAjG/RxEDg==