why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GC7IQO6QTDPMVW4TSMJFEJSTLRNM5KG4GZEEKVUB7SNX7TRXB335YOM4, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GC7IQO6QTDPMVW4TSMJFEJSTLRNM5KG4GZEEKVUB7SNX7TRXB335YOM4 is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 1b7e9b065320f14431e028958c5f3915a923080fc92c22b1ed695710d9ea4335
- request
- 77086ecfc1e0d52b1622966a00aae4bdf85c0ee20a33228231eff93c7d64e6a4
- transaction
- c8040b66e267d368bb066054c61be79d76abc254ecbeb320d6a7df5ef58b50cfcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 27778
the chainentry 27778
- sealed to the entry before
- ea127f94a5a2abad6c45582f592c4fd292399b04fc09f298d854afe6421d5b59
- this leaf
- 424de163e1a8d692867c7d8d02adc4afadb102efd1b8b8cc980619b0da5c0801
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- B8nMSiOdCbOquIJBPObn3N+sqtIQTyq+ZAXxDiD5aMYBibrvpKjaUEbxJHRl3vgMsVcqZcp4skry4oAwLKaFAA==