why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GCJD4W3AJG4HS4W4LGXUFWZAKU2XSDVXGLAORKC6Q24K4MTW7DHEMTNW, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GCJD4W3AJG4HS4W4LGXUFWZAKU2XSDVXGLAORKC6Q24K4MTW7DHEMTNW is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- aa128a087bcc2c46ac42c1bb84cca40234e2c0cc95c580ef4913b98bd92ec76c
- request
- 43f2a04c3e6247c5f54d7a7896305773d83f31621586d91a11f3b01ae331c2d7
- transaction
- 73a13ea60c0d502d0966b0a3a95704d8e8a4c03d37057ca09d149780709cb131computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 72
the chainentry 72
- sealed to the entry before
- 7a2d9a37f2d3f042ecfd019007d43230f8dd705f637bbe3f609d27ab05245f4a
- this leaf
- 4277f8591a52240d81e54ead8bbb768eb6f92bf8a8d2f977e945750e06dbef93
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 0M0h+D7HbGylO1F0Hf3+n1z5QKj81pVHBGXo5AlmoQ65ZK4ufC5otUz0Y9YuOJUZ0IqhVYP325qvKid6hfQdBA==