livelog 29,172 entries · root 8f2326cbf261 · read 03:43:05
the record/entry 29074
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GBXAUI6LSOK4HATQTLP5LECY5OQJ3TIYNWE26KXWJV5PLYD6273562YN to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 6.980ms2026-08-31 01:47:35
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GBXAUI6LSOK4HATQTLP5LECY5OQJ3TIYNWE26KXWJV5PLYD6273562YN to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
ca4f24cf0ed27fe1f35a0a510f0c98c94622aa49df2e6c152cd099d5dbdcb63f
request
da6f48c97253d8707ef1111735db3564539d6b871905fcdb102c1e97e2310e7f
transaction
79a4bd719268bc02b1c38679bc3791703b677d01840e5028a0da5161b2fdb30c
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 29074
recomputing…
the chainentry 29074
sealed to the entry before
131327ee198c2f0399ad4799c41af2da70b5bace3f613c1ef8eeba49e75790dd
this leaf
42e8f4f93b50b4d5e0a276613acb38a55c270a1fef4f0b8caed0386f22286f70
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
SJDk+DGWB6QZDomfmrA/Dhi2W37d121fs34ROEsXmVaBjHB6GZ3/y3euleRjGRxZrZ3TOUdxfFsRrx6dXCmHBA==