livelog 30,614 entries · root c02f220fe070 · read 06:03:12
the record/entry 29099
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GD2SK75OTGVWVQWX2K7GZDP4FVZMEJEOISVMRSH2CQQ64G7AU7UXWMOX to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 6.260ms2026-08-31 02:17:35
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GD2SK75OTGVWVQWX2K7GZDP4FVZMEJEOISVMRSH2CQQ64G7AU7UXWMOX to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
e79717b0dab9655bd3725fb852bbb3802068b523c73f53bfec5d96466f115953
request
6455a1cd702161397f7881ec64f2c7cfb0423b54651f10b6c513b0b09f9c3e3c
transaction
fa843ad375a312aaafe035c4a009d924831089fb2be21cad3395dce1cf6198ff
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 29099
recomputing…
the chainentry 29099
sealed to the entry before
74669386b2d5e0af8b1db6b509232038641540ee61e5263cea48e5b9ed993a33
this leaf
432dc2124c8b993c774d5bc3637012b8b932e0fef109a7947a1064954d528efd
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
p2FPre1yo41lu6YIDInNh4u4RzbOl70qHVTyIagwx1XqKrKpzP1XAGtpMYj7ochgR46vCLkjlBZbb/f48XwMBw==