why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GD6TDU5LLYOS4AXZ6RUD6ABNCFLPDK642B6C5I5EJ7GIQCBJBL7VEQNA to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 9a2a46d20fa91f6fb1eb77d00d660127d3c8010c93abe6611702d1a6bca9df9b
- request
- 404d94632649cabc9db19310eed5cd8457885baa064e50bcb973eb24e11a4efd
- transaction
- a32204ac95df1be7bf61ea705fcdae62cf52aec6a4d1185490b7b68340f5e3a5computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 53599
the chainentry 53599
- sealed to the entry before
- 75e4c2d70f8163816b3f2eb17b9fa88fb50b2983e5834d05da5a9d8ef24a6273
- this leaf
- 435259d8cfdb2dad0c4fb8005ced0aae8bcacc0e1ace37f528cae992ae97a7bf
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- S56LyC1d+fnbjLAokOL8HtzVqulv6Ab/TLH3tZdnIKKJcO24PgQ1kCj5NWkj1QYwbpHt949vvDzwfYFvHwP9Dw==