livelog 31,904 entries · root 2aa0cff552e5 · read 05:42:45
the record/entry 31435
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GBC4PAA53UWC6IQMRTEKXNQWC3WALTREM6327TOQHIVXIBBJKEWM5OPB to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 6.655ms2026-09-01 21:12:35
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GBC4PAA53UWC6IQMRTEKXNQWC3WALTREM6327TOQHIVXIBBJKEWM5OPB to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
077157cf98efeabdbfce9da0e6decbf8b64f5db26b709c016b945d3fe13a4535
request
4869e984d4ed3d9c465e1e72746844535e12b044221913efd093ca1da3edfc95
transaction
4b523432f3e678309309cab42692a0912c95c52d10836fcd41cd77d77405ec55
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 31435
recomputing…
the chainentry 31435
sealed to the entry before
c428ca30d14e4c63fc6da36f8b749042975e4cc84b99dd7f80aae1a7f022e8b7
this leaf
444f98343965ab8ce429db1da30bf8ca57be75d9e836e2b47a1c836e518ba2a6
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
bn1lk07harJ+hJXfb2UqHORBcbiFVb+dWseB4KFozAM48exS1TjSHuEJ3gT+g/2pxVwG3sIf3ncOYsOiblA9Dw==