why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GBLQWCNNB6OC3KFPP3MPWIFDXHT6F3AZW5F5NSWDRC3WJC4NMWH3A6AL to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 5d573aef1412fc3169c42c471eacee77a58f004e99e81e4bc00810ec1380fc96
- request
- 1358275db4b657ec2000f87bdc6f220cb935e3651e1508f12f14ec81e0bca2e3
- transaction
- c6eb2d6b4d048a1018e87c4d7b91a89b659f71e99a86079ebf3bde5a2d0fb1a3computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 6133
the chainentry 6133
- sealed to the entry before
- 79d6395cf567a6d759dc8b75b82da9a596e6801d13ac5991f4e0970da5f70ff8
- this leaf
- 450e338e402a7c231414d67bc43e8ceaee36b1b500dda370edbdaad3b9980f65
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- VzYOMt/u/zB2NH6LCZgGTIPmSkCI+E6ZChvQkk0YMnZqVB5TvYzCyMCg6lzDYuFza0n4h2Ny17GTlaC5GnbyAw==