why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GDQX6YQDVCCJHOOIRBV2B6ORU2GYHNIQEZP64JJK5V7VJT7L4X2OSMKL to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- d6c7fc403f62144e3c2e8f037f7c04ea7c7feca889b4a1229688966d30ea442c
- request
- b6bc25d3c0c3555ce5edf49b8f3cdb76cd753598a3c3ea578bfbc8389a98bd64
- transaction
- a3b4cad8a6feb7bd361e11b0316add741085323358d9e50a616828f231922dfbcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 26148
the chainentry 26148
- sealed to the entry before
- 45b4048ff9af8c3782aa07f8056b16e45ced6df4262595f58918568b82e9277d
- this leaf
- 450ef986a5e261b33f88b2559d0054623b2a85e3ee6c30c69efb450a17c86435
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- dSFCoE+12sKeOci57Xz2EdBNgjc8tJMBJ4OsrtaDg1oDzePFLIxAUwHYGUj+yYpQ9jsjautqEGHimfgG/JSqCg==