livelog 40,994 entries · root 54a1a7488551 · read 06:35:38
the record/entry 40838
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GDQDBHUHRSHEGAZUF7XOWLMPOY2CIWT5VB34VUXLSGP663F6YENZOXBB to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.696ms2026-09-09 03:40:10
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GDQDBHUHRSHEGAZUF7XOWLMPOY2CIWT5VB34VUXLSGP663F6YENZOXBB to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
88c6d1e08851b6542cf918ebc820b2565b830853950613802e88f7d939c84952
request
a5a8af9751b6b20147ed83feca5897a1ec91e32d096a0cd80380b87d312af442
transaction
9774affd17e54485859b63d309bec2f5ef3a658fcb19b199e5fdbe51e75f72af
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 40838
recomputing…
the chainentry 40838
sealed to the entry before
aeaa50dd035e2a4d6cd528d81d6b16dcb094b7c800f98af1245b52533f0f81eb
this leaf
45e4d6cf9c3b2675daff42a21618c0f041b37ccc7376d747c6b74cf8dee1ac7c
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
2BbP1PYVdJgVtE4z7ZKf3y7702doJiae/sEhoQ2MHkGqSY5RUmy8PqAOdyEgw1HmiSIeZnFpPjAfXnlSpeK3Cw==