why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCMHBMUNNC5ZJ33CRQIFKKINTECVFLR3LUCA66UF6EVYJ4OPXGNGK4JI to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 47d6b5b52ecfdc318a16704d006c899dfcc3f5b27e4d89f98d7b1235852f97e3
- request
- bbe46af18150c29d3fca135c43ebd45805a5f0829d7d33ea90c933d094b45368
- transaction
- 37ab1c25a52fca88da2f9c0d5808b59aae795cf25818d40f3f62c8c06bca2e63computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 68213
the chainentry 68213
- sealed to the entry before
- e4a62f4666ff291a29df44c8366d0b2cd1b947417fe23c87cfb27eb864eb07d8
- this leaf
- 47020b82bf2f801f3f6e23cb983206baa80f5fbf1038e4f376dcfdbb11b9a0e5
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- oDSwZqMVv7AkCFCHey6nmxOVdB7EufEAELJDbqUOG2yoqK1QnVErEl8E1keNOfQa33QTtwyS//L4NPFoqiwnAQ==