why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBKVKMG24LQHFBNPWGFVPDHFA3CAQV7NCQJHTNFMDQHW5AA5ZDM2EXQC, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GBKVKMG24LQHFBNPWGFVPDHFA3CAQV7NCQJHTNFMDQHW5AA5ZDM2EXQC is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- a7bce97ff2c0600d640120d0ecdfff3fc830022eaaae5940609d199f44f22668
- request
- 171f0aa6cf29929f7408f5dfa9bb908aa41aeaaa5f3e8ee8f75b0e8ca40cc8fb
- transaction
- b8c82628eabadb37630bd1e0d8acb995fa86c0c9d754bb580ad2650bf7d7717dcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 3271
the chainentry 3271
- sealed to the entry before
- 44b065404660e0d2f9c2188d39b31e4c2370e4bfc556a93221cad1ec5091b78d
- this leaf
- 47cb88c1806d906d447d47a0a035443a31d769a84b9f6c058504ac06ef69ec21
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- KHNxHDZvKtNX3KcMPdBtxnzVPoX/xdm3jTBh9aOSJOoShavCU8bz1lUSUEVpcvXeWShP9k0pHthrdAs+IeBkDQ==