why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GDYLZ7TT3LKJGC4NBTQAY2MGE4MS333LQVGQYDMZ4CCNCA6TQKH2HPEC to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- dc1b475ced8639fbb51f4ac555f6e8921f65ff960c86c09b12ef9bc18babbb21
- request
- 70a73f72be8c4f6b65b0662cf02bc0e3b67c3c7d009a11ea7b72a4be76832028
- transaction
- 718a51f34c29c352ecc859600449e75714f9393d8ddc89eadb4082ffee90f680computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 21210
the chainentry 21210
- sealed to the entry before
- 9504b9e524fe242ea04ae9e7cb5045d2ca85a95a3ab3c7408bdf63c922e50b68
- this leaf
- 48df5e1eec2e475e7e4d3e9f3bc468341940bf302c91183ad5568f8eed5da7ef
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- ZrSisHDhENq4FowcvIqnMbRmhYEJtsxM3IzK9zOl61OmSY63OXfNPEfqvGtwLgle6O+SmLRjQGST1l9GsCMDDA==