livelog 44,678 entries · root c6c2d24e3e03 · read 03:01:46
the record/entry 44093
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GAFQI5DNV353NGTGZ7VA3TZJYFQG7HAEYVB4ILN6EJPIUGRH44CKMV6G to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 6.842ms2026-09-11 16:10:10
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GAFQI5DNV353NGTGZ7VA3TZJYFQG7HAEYVB4ILN6EJPIUGRH44CKMV6G to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
c217f5ed213c8111a620faf1f97532ac0367bd97422b3fb8d3e874e7589b3ba1
request
48bb98dd287131ca54c47183b9595c68892cac0e3c7dc29e36a45f022c187534
transaction
e14894837fb6987593626cfd8738e292484703027979e875da8ba0f098075eb5
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 44093
recomputing…
the chainentry 44093
sealed to the entry before
71889f438ee84c051802f11c336ea82b186659d46c087428fc9cbd92ecd08b48
this leaf
494630d62922d98c123965a268a7a3021caed5ea1ba63009aee58d74b43a792c
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
TOhh9Fps0lhLlvrSWvGBdhSm333RG51i231qahrS4n1XINm1VwahY9FHYVWKVNsV+KdISyVXlkRfmvTnjNwZBw==