why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCECF7O76LV72DTCQT6OTJPKO6XVXZIUHQDORX6OJF4RHKZX6FAWC3CA to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- cc4e2ab9eea702ff97709bc9ec70469aa5c94ba56a26bd976c379426715b06cc
- request
- b76995c1c47ef1c2c72929c8cc5c1d2aacc0696626c1e95a9781b9b2ac89b7c4
- transaction
- 669311963d58f1b5850b5aab3234f5fd166f3570a22f8530b94bf5d75acd4bb5computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 77040
the chainentry 77040
- sealed to the entry before
- 3c53845b213d6c8224f182ea7abf1720f064d5f210fa9ee8dd82bd47be1a3794
- this leaf
- 49f73435e25e38e1ecde90cb8fafb52cae9c9f96f5b3fecf8172479835ef973f
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- jQlALBTufe6D735IwOCN5a3Yap8YrFrTz04IpnJKWtlAivtovga6kHceHeRGRDHUEKFgkFzf56z9Lgrg7OGyDQ==