why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBJYFEX4QFXWGIW5I4GEVABOPW4EF7SCO2N5CIO4YNABNYUKOK6LU5BC, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GBJYFEX4QFXWGIW5I4GEVABOPW4EF7SCO2N5CIO4YNABNYUKOK6LU5BC is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- f38f09cdc02d50322e6b9db162080b9e2d8da3f738a1e0863c4bcddb551fbaef
- request
- 0a3f52f820fa694b37f49168e10a48743be4b313d2b9c4f87dfd781040c3f256
- transaction
- e4b739c791500c887af2a8bcbe2cafb4792f42f8b5b2185af5b58e2c64f03dcdcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 72359
the chainentry 72359
- sealed to the entry before
- 6a12449dfd30a087c9b236d7cb4af03ff88ccbbf7c293e922748e131fdffc326
- this leaf
- 4ba22a201f5ab4f18176ba20a24d89ac19517c3945c26bdc8ada21ceb1c75e70
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- jCwyypNhL/OaAREiuU489umoz4+eZDUtrO5Kr2EYVUvb73AbE8i1FrQ2S0Go0sEMvgWFyg52IF8Ng7hJr/43DQ==