livelog 29,123 entries · root bb507527fa51 · read 02:47:53
the record/entry 28983
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GCJYTVXANWUMUT7XDLDA3ES4SZ7O7TIEEVTWWLKPIHF4LF4GK5ERW24S to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.163ms2026-08-31 00:02:34
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GCJYTVXANWUMUT7XDLDA3ES4SZ7O7TIEEVTWWLKPIHF4LF4GK5ERW24S to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
de022dcff9e8d634f83651edb9a5cfc52424de8cc7bd2d8d8cb9a8d78583a973
request
decbe04a0d4085b15d1e98f47d522f054531954cc63eda0359327313812ecb7a
transaction
6ccdd98091ecfe9695b63ced363ca903ae78873ad554bccfd2e37ef13ac4a3bb
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 28983
recomputing…
the chainentry 28983
sealed to the entry before
f1c59f16a934740db570e22431f220b8914e5be2940bef56c6d5450316fd11eb
this leaf
4bc39a1e8ffc0d4105a073f8001654925a4f06cb15757496fdc783fc43e5d01b
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
5tpMQj/sQXL7rj9navlfeJout22sjcvXuYOeZ4xCP/WO1gPBDcCqAIlOzJGkKN6KSSCwpMV8LZ3qsYDKAo+CAQ==