livelog 61,243 entries · root 666ac9231b0b · read 13:05:21
the record/entry 61100
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GCKOPJ6WAL6IAPMQIHEYXHXWNHNFRJNBCWFEGEZWEZEFJPAL3LTQCLV5 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.771ms2026-09-24 10:30:14
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GCKOPJ6WAL6IAPMQIHEYXHXWNHNFRJNBCWFEGEZWEZEFJPAL3LTQCLV5 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
c030b70da0bf39c48e998353594fb61360c7c77330812854416d71572f7b6100
request
02928881bf6fc0a1f08a834dce05dacd5870f737e0eabe7eb69de6f8456d2ac4
transaction
a520a7607d3c2bde45035dbfd625aa5551278207ec14b600b8488593f95eca81
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 61100
recomputing…
the chainentry 61100
sealed to the entry before
936c113fa52af6133b92ece810d885e56dd4fd70afd3166039abff8b98a8e007
this leaf
4beb2e9e482a413b10dec681059c4f958acf9309244a3dfd4092fbe33efe2648
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
s7IUpkxQmhCD6u9RB1LNUcJoDB1Gheig47l90PqC6VE/iXphfmF+alebL+9EzcoMzDIIrLOPJgPRq3F8MXqgBw==