livelog 33,341 entries · root 3a1683243d85 · read 08:07:35
the record/entry 33214
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GCEIPAQ27NJCRE2ENJSTL2PSL2IITB3LQNCPADRXXH7WL22QTHMLCPJR to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.819ms2026-09-03 05:47:34
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GCEIPAQ27NJCRE2ENJSTL2PSL2IITB3LQNCPADRXXH7WL22QTHMLCPJR to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
1683d91da300fe3b5b40b66e6484d6b155fc0fab8a009bd4deb7bb9d855307ef
request
c47983bf6db2b65bf915dd15c11569e5b30684ca327f5ca7024dd9e91c63ec9e
transaction
abceab176756380c2afadcd10b1c9b08aca4a45dd0855b9e1f1ee8df81a9aef4
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 33214
recomputing…
the chainentry 33214
sealed to the entry before
56283189261ba293459c18ca086659b3f83b1ccfdb53d7bcda540e4145147bcc
this leaf
4e162d0a48525bbcabb373cac92686fdd45bc16d84e8ab24b76509086fd6879b
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
rhJqpygr4soGtu3wDQ2ZDY3KTRmeshSBld1x1cCkEnaUmGbuGrgCDuaWoNjM32nCC2BAs4qjJiiRgl8Y6bupAA==