why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GDXEZDYQHQX7IUHCRUAVXUY3N66JQ3CBDS2X7RI5BBJLZNUVVTCVAVHT to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- e2d121899d3d50921c5beabe6c43db8c6a89218aec8e1551cb82dbc2cd8f3e56
- request
- 045e6eddf4631daa1a8dbdff3e5bcdc7ad7e496ce0b777c08dfdd991910d6f54
- transaction
- 8bcc86552392ba6081424e894422570886b042f634c3931eda25fa3d8f7ef05bcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 9487
the chainentry 9487
- sealed to the entry before
- 2528e7373582f105374f4d014f7b99d56aca8c3653ba2ab41d6f5e734142da47
- this leaf
- 4e42229f098bb0f9fb89071407bead0ab9371c50b257d291844f894d0b5e3934
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- pSldr4T6Ekt17a9Y2iW9IE6WyzizOOvYjhRlwRyB1iYCgKkc9dQI5jk+/Zf3XdfpW+uW+NskGxibPJF3fN+eDA==