livelog 10,167 entries · root fc9e5331421b · read 09:52:33
the record/entry 8578
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GCUCDMWYWLMWVTKWQGXZQ2IE4WWGOKARMLHE3KA6FH7VOPGNGHJFXBIK to 108 over the last 60000ms, above the 90 window cap, with 78 already spent
decided in 6.388ms2026-08-15 04:37:37
why1 reason
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GCUCDMWYWLMWVTKWQGXZQ2IE4WWGOKARMLHE3KA6FH7VOPGNGHJFXBIK to 108 over the last 60000ms, above the 90 window cap, with 78 already spent

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
93db65f71e019fe2660a48a966d987a15f424722c1a5a39c6735320b14d70a53
request
9b4a36269d1983aa6c72f243ff6f45f9739535dccb2af3bcdf6aa34c788e1394
transaction
e95dc69d2a2777cbd54b8ef3a5d52bf3de3df3790bf308453ec1bb4501bd2ecc
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 8578
recomputing…
the chainentry 8578
sealed to the entry before
51d290d12a979d042b2b57c0024505617aeb1611f5fc8ab9a74913ced5878012
this leaf
4e5315affc7a51a48ab3d006980faee6475c19fa771a5e0e66b004b869b7fe21
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
D9/BNk12xACmzaCcl7+Wjv9sR9S8elguSCsA0nPlwsljhNEb85ejM+R0ApNZl1q3RTuJOnwuisDV45T/jqR/DA==