why1 reason
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GCIAXZCQQN4QSB3CBCB3TMSR66BN6WEAPXLUNQYCB55KA4CXQLZKGF5H, which is not in the allowlist
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 7a596dbf55a2496cd385babc5a32958811a15b591705fc0655ae00c19d907283
- request
- 96b513c35f082705a90b8add11655428d0e598b3be6b998b93b13b4f2d0c117b
- transaction
- 75dc62d536a46ee98169c3243b05488dcb8a71b997f980b47a38afd7e41205c8computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 40214
the chainentry 40214
- sealed to the entry before
- 0b48be2a02b0e619b6eba36a7191f8155b6092da2a36494959376facf6b89d45
- this leaf
- 4fa9f77e4ae825bdd41a33b09d4b4a8e161eb571a36d901843704c2a72e4bf27
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- bd3KYOyVEDy6IOtyv0I+oBrbjMg0IckV6FV4bTr8hF+PE/r13HEesWi9w50620oG68b/IBe7+ssKdMV9uIu9BQ==