why3 reasons
realitydelegated_fee_payer
fees are paid by GBXP6R37ETJCFVHUWDF2H45PL5J5Z6VZ5JSQNI4FLEAPPQ4QERJECCJA, an account the mandate never named
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GDVNSGWB6XGZ3EBJHLBYP3M4TTQKLOXH7MHAHCYY2DHSUERE3LE3TO6E, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GDVNSGWB6XGZ3EBJHLBYP3M4TTQKLOXH7MHAHCYY2DHSUERE3LE3TO6E is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 0c1d719455cecbdce862754fb6d9311ccd93b16bdbd7d85f3e65a5ef45a24e65
- request
- 6cd5b57c99498b55a3194f670c19005e10cbb57517a1d8f40dbc1e053f83ecfd
- transaction
- 035d163ea34f36b3bfcb14618b41be780878ff052fe72d7ee53bcde5c8089fdbcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 70596
the chainentry 70596
- sealed to the entry before
- 2e1c152d42c95b6f805d5b0f35ef28249a7aefd16c3a9f5d318257baaf515c29
- this leaf
- 506eac81a40d7bfede1c7ad110e9a1d9e26f280f080064d8e9e2f1b93d0f7458
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- t3BFIkwmCsVPE4MZhNeYSQWjnXZDn7b5AhefGk+myOSonPQVVXo4PU9Kl35VciXltABntfgUILKABcJujwCyCA==