why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GDDHT54IW4RZ3RYIEHHVKKBWWHRIZ6XIJU5OYDTC2ZRTQLWIDZIOKR4O, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GDDHT54IW4RZ3RYIEHHVKKBWWHRIZ6XIJU5OYDTC2ZRTQLWIDZIOKR4O is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 951e1cc7284cd6fea6657f521a549d96c30ea6bcd6f62d65ad262d8fd6b07ea1
- request
- b018aee8460789122e2574da307c3c2251f4789991b295def7f4d385d2a6f70b
- transaction
- 753c5744b257b274a5bad45f24e927c305b91402c43638c03b1ea02e0289bbdacomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 797
the chainentry 797
- sealed to the entry before
- 0adf9df59eccb0af448015b879a34b8b2dffc3f18e3dc7e8192a3ba935c3893e
- this leaf
- 50a469a3b3b4d911dd3f466bd08d24c1d6ac0cca28a90564469124c6f98ad5ef
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- tQdAtPyLC5VBpQuxvqnrnZzCsRE8OI2BiJL55e4fKhhZE/HgQB7MaAMmP3WJiiCISbQxfomXbcwPt+tdDSGIBg==