why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GB6TU4NKRZKNMUTG65FUUL7XR5ZAJ4CF2HGCIHSIAXX2BGKHOIR24FD7, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GB6TU4NKRZKNMUTG65FUUL7XR5ZAJ4CF2HGCIHSIAXX2BGKHOIR24FD7 is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 93c1dbde506f0f2c3851a86c812c3588528ce5d6ee5d2d76f3a2c19a0b5a4384
- request
- cc9c73c859e24f68923dbf8810bd4f89a98974e8fa3cad26fc5f1939d5e9f91c
- transaction
- 0de8a36fe233731bce4742bb12e97131e41a3fab2190f0075ca4e77bf86ee786computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 20423
the chainentry 20423
- sealed to the entry before
- 0c2af0dfc59b34f1adc1e5d8e25bfae2d9391e7d9847cf9b00a9be1750dd32f9
- this leaf
- 50b4226da6a66aa5d9b668a3f0ed8d2cfa766768bc68d86f2013d5f88d29b9ef
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- NAEV0P4JiXrSh8Rr3l6OyXolVMRQ4XPs4Z2vDTD7bPe1YWNZegxVThT3OlMcC+YsYpWoa1qa/Nwjv5XRmuRwBA==