why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GCLBCEDGBCHI72VEQPQLMMK7UTQK6CJCQEP7FK24RLPXVTZTMA6VCP6B to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- f6be3562d57562ecbe1e61ea0b06dfbde98de568e09f2c1789810c253c9eff99
- request
- 6d358ecec3a1b8df4a444726253a0ab14acd2273bd49f62685b0679fe9912604
- transaction
- cdfeb4036e9508d100b400f64cacded1866d2ab770a0f465b1f24f0e6269dd0dcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 35080
the chainentry 35080
- sealed to the entry before
- 038de340df5cf593cca908d9f6f29673c9d0a1fa8e7e60bac7fd93c325349e76
- this leaf
- 512a5a5ff940d83e406de64b5b244b22ed063bb2d0c390145dfb10512733a0be
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- x/IjbJWXaKG7pWMVO2btUuRNS6TgZ8KR7l7f4xRUIjnsGsLPQnHgKfiy6L60sswbnSa1jxikwTEecCiRnldKCQ==