why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GC4HPWNCNDD3GWYME3CCGGXVYB6XAIXHVGFUK7IPZ3NPAB22OQDXMN2B, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GC4HPWNCNDD3GWYME3CCGGXVYB6XAIXHVGFUK7IPZ3NPAB22OQDXMN2B is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 44ab57b01db636412d33873c2bfa5935d2ef71ee44e9dc971f8228c57b965f98
- request
- d3cd4394c4423e4934e90093bba596c1c2999d15962fc1e284ddd1cd52ad2e8e
- transaction
- 7f9cc60a09736debaf6a4e4d17776aff4466472762c5df9b539ef6bd190e6cd0computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 36383
the chainentry 36383
- sealed to the entry before
- 762c32ce36fa839727135cdf06979a70edfa02232e6945aecb09ed0ce085b91c
- this leaf
- 52abbf969beb003eb6a3117a370ecce73c99cbc65055ea777b765b1487d4d321
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- nYF4Pz5dbLaGV981/2Vw9m60QJ1xVDuTajiFTppcKO9Ra9i9Tn2iLngQNvHSMHkpTXrZV5JDha92P/RU/pSwCg==