why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GBLXIY7AYPDRQFENON2HOTIKVQLGEQSJPXOFXHMHFG2CXPM5N6RBVHTB to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 1843cf9880cc36f7a6a1655bf78b994187854d70cca9626cb4c68da973fc730f
- request
- 982db6b2a83f318a82b225b8b40e987dfba1b70eb0ffc1b3fbb31bb5fd4e9d1f
- transaction
- 290a4acf19d01fe986264fbac5fd3060e9ef7cdb7bbffaad64b7de6f2a6d1bb4computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 53899
the chainentry 53899
- sealed to the entry before
- 90908be504426748441832e25409d757de5b54fc369796c087a0f56e9591ddb9
- this leaf
- 532e3e1bedfc6e4826b9f7517fb832cc0cee02cbf2967f86431cbe8eaeda8fd1
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- p4lGsbaKT2HZg6Gza5SwpyT2zJqjOE3wW5iD1AllaKq8VtJ6I/pHjXFDMvYDngBroSeFiE0732+TMW+RSjk0BQ==