why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GASMEMX7PAGRO43ZH4DCUTHC2NJMSR4FRAF6XDS5SBOECIHONINOJIUP, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GASMEMX7PAGRO43ZH4DCUTHC2NJMSR4FRAF6XDS5SBOECIHONINOJIUP is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 1bcd4ced65b6d16a3467eaf5ed2e37bb2e9b8450898bc8537c9878c79d9e9d9f
- request
- d1d51a5d6f58c83aa12a050d8c6230664a01a5dc890ab61bb6eea01282f2ca87
- transaction
- c237da0f3b7db30a043d20ee56d1837a15e6c87f42ec62c23ebdc60095d75626computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 65261
the chainentry 65261
- sealed to the entry before
- b7171dcbc1e1268eeb355acd3945f4f34cc2d0b0aa89c4ecb7a0571667741b40
- this leaf
- 537cd52568f9e6817d3b3cd8cfcdee5fdfdf69c1ccd7205ac3822aaecf7265ad
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 9vBXmKrtIlPbQrqUn9jcJTqlLreVfG93HwAZI/Ts3LUULiDru0ICQ7jIRpfUl2hvG8qt/hYPsGPKmot78YTjAg==