why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GCCHRGAX63NTM4XEOQAZ5YZPBQKC5ZFRZF4S3G7AGP7ZIGMIFHYYD4ZI, which is not in the allowlist
post_approval_integritydefinition_changed_since_approval
the tool or contract definition fingerprinted a3f1c0de9b7452e8 when the human approved and fingerprints 77b2e4901ac6df35 now. the approval covers something that no longer exists
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- b367f253f7a71d77b7ce70311ff91bf60a4c8b500b9ed86de0edadd28fe054ef
- request
- 189b044a347d65686bb024c3ea357f1ffaba590f4a9156d32e408ad41afb8bc8
- transaction
- 5d5aa8bb6d506bb1b6ffd3a655817d9ee870b0e672f610616321f6ef81b9ebe0computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 57264
the chainentry 57264
- sealed to the entry before
- b16d1f16c80c052b98052fbfcbb38265533691e0e8f61ad065db122205c8a296
- this leaf
- 54dd287df638108ee4134ccabd0e3ef970e55a4b12b709b73a21d36a66b479e1
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- CvjzNRGdzwsZuKRkX1d6o/gIFPWxcy73teBAVx3QEePxX8MGA4eLvMWEE5h/ySAEMHoVzoM/gEZy7v/pavnMAw==