livelog 40,812 entries · root 245e367dcb02 · read 03:05:19
the record/entry 40630
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GDQFL7XOYBV7D3ZYYHY556S5DAPL3TNZWJENNYDFJKUDG5ONU76X672S to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.675ms2026-09-08 23:50:03
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GDQFL7XOYBV7D3ZYYHY556S5DAPL3TNZWJENNYDFJKUDG5ONU76X672S to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
7640e8ee79225c9a069be3ac92bfdb003a7fa36de23e2a304fec77df3c317780
request
0253a6fe383bdcde8e200045993dfe41ecfcbf3b738d457ec30d90bff2d0036e
transaction
2f7b60f5fd25ab3c6568972bdbc9296ea605e83ea7777066f433f2dead9d1ff1
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 40630
recomputing…
the chainentry 40630
sealed to the entry before
a9d99e728e4ea93316533e88f2ec68d9089e5dc059215f22b17167aa7d4049c5
this leaf
5518cdb963c6356911305cdf9954800ae6ba96acd312f40ef0ab50b338bffff7
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
EUMIAif/gS5lKjGH6oQPnIvwNuEQlArqRzgY5yq8kc2EhE3gSp8U5/Q9JEPXleqsZFRKr7EbQJlWj5FBKqeAAQ==