why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GCY3XQ4MLBZUZBOJE5Q36TOD5OADVS4UB5HBY54HL4SWX7ID6KR3G5NH, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GCY3XQ4MLBZUZBOJE5Q36TOD5OADVS4UB5HBY54HL4SWX7ID6KR3G5NH is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- b6446ff7e313679a354c35dfa028dce654032aa9af1764ef65ba8902d08eb5fc
- request
- 1387d6f9ee5a0db2ba82eba5beb2ff7d384ae17876dc8f4567c61907a5035f1f
- transaction
- dcb0d8ec7c891167a72da206f5ece9c88029f90bdc7f7f364d323be0658e92f7computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 1671
the chainentry 1671
- sealed to the entry before
- f2b4b4256ec78983d87ad7fd40e84de09cf5aab57233d67f380151fe2d70f596
- this leaf
- 5572d4877ae8b5c0a0aa676c5d5da0258c29aff5def313b9309ae24c1b49640f
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- SipdF14VdRwPIGGnd+DmHxd6eT8wExZHQXgC99jELZ8+Sq7TUYsUUJ2gH4tQ3Z+rRkdlW5PTzX0lIk9du7IGDQ==