why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBPXK6D5CV67KQFOGXODE4DQHDE36FCORNWGPZXSYHSUWYVDB6JWVDUH, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GBPXK6D5CV67KQFOGXODE4DQHDE36FCORNWGPZXSYHSUWYVDB6JWVDUH is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 44a0ded0bd4bb91dbb0f26d3cb8cc559a7f8d236ddafe086f3f3eaa95bdb318e
- request
- c057d5430fa83fbc13cedbbea5223735116ef647f8a326c9c76dac1582b7ac33
- transaction
- 40e74c7798c666c361a094d26bd3a45b19e76f763089c98d3ef6c4304cb061d0computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 58459
the chainentry 58459
- sealed to the entry before
- 4511615e45e87d6e2eb82b32b97bf640aa0f5a1e5c529b6888e6a81d3279e600
- this leaf
- 55cd3c019dee28c332f7873a490c11deeb1a3d005e71fc40c49101369e681ce3
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- KfaZ5DE5Ahn5v5NJ2+zKTP7BUpXL83q7KZPt/3nbnuZD7utPn//m4j2NUxkRN2mB1DJasNaXRtfWkTEUwbZ+Bw==