livelog 16,783 entries · root 23bc7891b0e9 · read 13:02:34
the record/entry 15998
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GCUXBLCUFGTBQEOWE2ZXIC4BHCZRJ7OU5CZHKT3VCYMQOFQ5A6U76INK to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 8.551ms2026-08-20 22:37:28
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GCUXBLCUFGTBQEOWE2ZXIC4BHCZRJ7OU5CZHKT3VCYMQOFQ5A6U76INK to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
e481c9bd40e3948cabea0b171a9ce0bd193c070079c24359d884218d608803f3
request
69ce9c879efc95d5a6ff05b39633c98328b1754a9900a4bc7681d56d3d894db6
transaction
7104d6e1e8d0dc072ce96201fe5617b0c7be4d4ee1a2c3d62e9d532a5b0d72fc
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 15998
recomputing…
the chainentry 15998
sealed to the entry before
f0c366bfcdbed34458e6f03589d9ded839cf06e573e36645f5fc0dbe16922b9d
this leaf
56853dd7139e5ff860eed4b0717d5ebded27219cb801c5585d7bb0684dbb739e
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
aoLoZtjKgLyiSL7eZNPvRycZg4E3iZBPMhBebBiNRPSxNTQt+9XEJgr8ow2LcUZwbfXf3rVxvnezlUlWLGHXCw==