why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GCADELM2JF5I46NZKY3KCEHLNF5RX3XTTF6PXFO3AIJYG4QDM4RCOAEZ, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GCADELM2JF5I46NZKY3KCEHLNF5RX3XTTF6PXFO3AIJYG4QDM4RCOAEZ is on the screening list: force-escalated by the watchdog: the pattern "address-poisoning" was refused 7 times in this session, first at 2026-09-16T08:27:33.696Z
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- da7e030d3cb8e6621803d166ca684ef70696cb8f074238fe77727c2ffbca120d
- request
- e7029f2ab3c4df19d403e8f5ec4a2acdd4ad664662f9cde670cee67ec431452e
- transaction
- e3b388493a45ed9392746d39029d1aa80ef8589296cadda00d918356698bfce9computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 50726
the chainentry 50726
- sealed to the entry before
- b6d25ad7e9bcaecfe38fe1c4c907e09495c1d09e97bc385dcd2ccd755629546d
- this leaf
- 569970b6f07d665680064d18bb2f56a15ae66cb0aaba93fd9c53c5c74eb534fa
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- slKSDaZBv44a8RBfZDu2Hy1098mJkmsWZFKJ2m6vc7tyBKeH4ONa7mbNMMT2VQe8TQdkJiL7zcl5Irs0mWLdBg==