why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GBJQ7F3T4EDXDQBYZ4C6F4I4IBV7JHBLYK2MVPJ44LTSY4DNNJK22Z7P, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GBJQ7F3T4EDXDQBYZ4C6F4I4IBV7JHBLYK2MVPJ44LTSY4DNNJK22Z7P is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 8ec4f6b7b164d76d67813b1663d5f53761cfb7d81a6a3da717b14f1134c2bac0
- request
- 843c47bbda5641aa490eaa0bb0848ca8c7e12434e86fc8510d43b5bb07947427
- transaction
- e17731d62bdce724b1214d4bcc7faa4f606712ad8f8522899628e97b9f588a0dcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 52418
the chainentry 52418
- sealed to the entry before
- 36c25a92f1424b82553ee5bb64d42cbcb9705e6c390a1f78bdd4e7d023274fe9
- this leaf
- 56edff1f8850e9e4263002dfbcb5f6caa4904629e24ce1f15522a621b770a71f
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- +7p9ImjiMjhwSdiHfDXV9+dSL5zcoNliygagEIQ3AQcXGg3XqSNiWJSbOeQ3DGHgRssEPIWxd996tuL8/i1HBw==