why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GDDS7V3DWW7QS4PGE75UIQGACSV3UXCY3CQTGL3NLTSXVVPCGRYAQ7S5 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 32437211d9cf8052755f821c6d41fb79af16f3a318f2334fd14f905253acf570
- request
- 59663d827e70384a486415cc0e243dd085d00a7510a86ca96c35db9827a5a0e9
- transaction
- 6c8d6c79bf70b4fe97126f03b00c1a8511b4b60be1eb6b3d54f1d65a29c0270fcomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 45730
the chainentry 45730
- sealed to the entry before
- 4e1489d197ca45ec3b3fd1a4e2ad421cf75b8111cfb1b8d340669bc374943685
- this leaf
- 57a637d95ad6ebba9d5d3ceae1be5da027774fc729ce0469e7ee1b269da39502
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- hz0ubbuTObXgsCa79aEu3Z+ehFic019WRfqdmo+O3LfNPyJZJKhzdnL6iPqySzm6y8ZcjjJ7lz3vN/qJQnXaBw==