why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GB4VAINQMC54NU442HTPXTOEZYFSSMYNSHSQF7VXIZKLGV535237IINA, which is not in the allowlist
post_approval_integritydefinition_changed_since_approval
the tool or contract definition fingerprinted a3f1c0de9b7452e8 when the human approved and fingerprints 77b2e4901ac6df35 now. the approval covers something that no longer exists
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 453b20bee90f119ffb5b295a567eb9e8483fa00db8ac271882cdcff7b9461dd4
- request
- c680774740c9c633e6af5ec0f0e3b8641adaeca85e6e7df1e74b6cbe5acdcd6b
- transaction
- f9a7bb21b04ac019c3eeea529c2257d5d4f2769c0199afc206db4045e9d38792computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 50409
the chainentry 50409
- sealed to the entry before
- d1a45a791e121eaa1e909e9a3ae3d036797ef854b1b774a2902ba1d16b188603
- this leaf
- 5868830eeb5172dcf5d82108655e61f982418409a9bb4f9282555f8ec3fc0fe0
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- OJHkbA8fQ0Rs1L7XVVItDFpBTV1UeKRdSkY+DTSU7WHIW7bHwtw08mfBpcIxGesWdmV9ZbFGZXgawIN90ldYDg==