why2 reasons
mandatedestination_not_allowed
op 0 pays GCNE6MJWF3EYWQQDTQPOZC47GD3RTUC4OK3KDRZEVLVNA3JEWDFBG64N, which is not in the allowlist
counterpartycounterparty_denied
GCNE6MJWF3EYWQQDTQPOZC47GD3RTUC4OK3KDRZEVLVNA3JEWDFBG64N is on the screening list: you placed this account on the screening list for this run
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 734ac62ddb48de3f553af6ffe01f7b97ec7dad501955ba838e5ac4af48a921b3
- request
- 1ab29e071683ad7218eb661560fe6064e1ef345a5d48053cb3f5c0265d0fab09
- transaction
- 7482d4a46732dd107f2bd315e56279d843950b8e3d9f2d6c4578d5b06e123faacomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 36663
the chainentry 36663
- sealed to the entry before
- 9963333a81fbac041895c97beeed415af00d1ffc5fafa087494f3df87630a036
- this leaf
- 58b56ff078a068c013cecdf7191343d3f8b654769798b9df8cbc279c7e4ddd76
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- 4yUyCVL8D45+JGbqUa1UTd/P6k6GbiIA+BVEUQ4e2VlnNOoyAEg2XlccuJnMY/bzPvdNT134N9rklSUFw2YECg==