livelog 29,123 entries · root bb507527fa51 · read 02:47:53
the record/entry 29020
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GCZ7YYASCLBQTOB6CTGAA7RJHRBVRVW37QCVBFYGABAPR2APRGEJPLES to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 7.069ms2026-08-31 00:47:35
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GCZ7YYASCLBQTOB6CTGAA7RJHRBVRVW37QCVBFYGABAPR2APRGEJPLES to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
35aba22de5717f0a3a005c86e6825cf9477d59646d72b2b6ff2383472d775ee5
request
8ab89a8b8cd993bdf4fd0377905f2b581ac26f15644e89d78db1232432525afa
transaction
2da86c960cd707d4cfd3d68c94bd5cd2ba5f8bbdb2349ec0cf055741c30c24b7
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 29020
recomputing…
the chainentry 29020
sealed to the entry before
316bf67179def149c8c373f103983464a9c375f4730cbbd77712ea6706c0d3c9
this leaf
58fbd60325499379c287485d68ac557ac10a303556509340b937ef32741a046e
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
4yHz3/3mZdljYDcGgoa6WlgkukF6fTmy45uA3VhSEoa2W1G5jytYft8+v2MDAUhI2vspAgRivs7JrM4QU5g8Bw==