livelog 43,770 entries · root eb4b98ea2980 · read 10:05:14
the record/entry 42894
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GB4UMEMOB7IZSDVNIK4KGMOTRPBPYP5XSOMJ7QI4ZTWY6UROSSCVSJUM to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 6.818ms2026-09-10 18:10:11
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GB4UMEMOB7IZSDVNIK4KGMOTRPBPYP5XSOMJ7QI4ZTWY6UROSSCVSJUM to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
aed4a645157cd2db22ea321ca8ca1907221f6933ef48edc5e4a59baba111af56
request
6c1aefa513d8dae7e319fe1453306348115bdc763b56d4d56384f28b97e35d9f
transaction
18e71cea1f59e812aadfd9afe73a3f4aecb8185922dbc6855e0ba61a0a172ae9
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 42894
recomputing…
the chainentry 42894
sealed to the entry before
4101f2c89f15209bb57ee8785ba97a0eb203cc0462e14b77f4480b7aac56451c
this leaf
598c71bf1163498de97acda45a63127737bb6993a86896f50b4dd8ecbd7562d5
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
efj2FErbW1W3FmYMDWcpldaMBM/dCdpH4BFfrgqee9N1pSqXs+XbMDjYvy73EfGrxJY/3pvZ+V+h3UpDu7JqAg==