why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GD4XUE43ZI4QI765VFY4QYCVZCLMITKSYCXMVSNSG7QDEZ25E7YM7CRQ to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 9e826c09f96d52a94ad4cc6d43850c4367efb35bf7badf08a93669531bfa0811
- request
- c9d73f3bcc8fbcabcbca0fb16fbfab1cf8b36d6295931b48336b4ca3f861a926
- transaction
- 28b76d350be3cbe6069c0c4ccf9bf4c101a731966c9b37b90ca21bfd6bd616c3computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 19876
the chainentry 19876
- sealed to the entry before
- b7f42378e54b97ac1c49b049ced302e3edda789450e2da480bed309e2d5370a9
- this leaf
- 5b46239c6ce10749f10282c71f5a501873145d5a1e7196fc7ec9b6982d88cb2d
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- QckV37r2s8LP4oVFgEOutJ0OClccCPZkvJ+wtjuN0dlribeN++LmKL1BIuhPNhR4hhPEqErP9nfJQeGyMIzLAg==