why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GDHB7XGVTJZYZIK7J5RTIO4D27GDKM5PF5LV762HXNLLMKQMLQCNMXA6 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- a116bd62ae8dcb95327d2a4106f159f403e4dc1fb5bbdcbffb21064b33dbeab2
- request
- 82a21f70e84b6d370f37d25a2ef31dc52d2a8ca99a692f96ec3bcb37a7cd9038
- transaction
- 31ea3e9c5e1cd334f73acf16e49fa8c3925797251d0b01b582346e101dfc48a6computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 73187
the chainentry 73187
- sealed to the entry before
- bb282549375615cd58b3b0788a1fc9b4f5a028c1938e346468548bd5da3585ee
- this leaf
- 5c86b9134311395fd45fe6ebeb5ca285c39712569d92f73e5ec53bcaafbbbf65
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- QPCwX34AO8YSHmIXxaFHZ2akPsQIvs8NvKcdF97/pMcFMav5AJ8KRu8Cb1HDuYY4cFwU+vT0euqbF+3ba018AA==