why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GBPAZ6EIJQ6RORSKJVE4DLV6F4LIPINUEDHVSAC6YD2HNBIOWSZZEOLA to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 9aa62e42ebf70b5eefc0f6042d292b09c952542d12813432431606d28b79c211
- request
- 4b611277ff3c6f6c2ddbdea84c0a590e780259bb57707d66f506a49fa9d71db9
- transaction
- 463b4ed8e7054e57dccbb47dbc6675bbbd7b46128fdbaedc8d3ed305b1c2f7a0computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 7608
the chainentry 7608
- sealed to the entry before
- e93a6d8f7a49e666f26adef0e2a7bb876149ae27a0142ea480e421491a0b5d8a
- this leaf
- 5ce78448db9376b1178555ad0d5711eef46b09d2f9cc2fdabf96b6a97d64ca27
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- +mjT4LZQwirLgqUjoNatwrDoDDPQILtnSyLOEPjNNipO+7juvqpE25la5g2mYELt8S43/zQbH4nLHXmMcYvtBw==