livelog 57,944 entries · root e5e15257f29e · read 00:00:45
the record/entry 57815
DENY
refused before it reached the network
this would take GDTA47KOLBFQQQW3IBJ5QLNXIBUA3PYUMAPLIERUXCROQ7HC7DPPVF56 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
decided in 8.664ms2026-09-21 21:30:13
why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded

this would take GDTA47KOLBFQQQW3IBJ5QLNXIBUA3PYUMAPLIERUXCROQ7HC7DPPVF56 to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent

mandateamount_exceeds_cap

op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40

what it was decided fromfingerprints
rule compiled from it
99e3e38675769d08ac331e72e03e2cf96c22515787228314d668ccca3beef6a9
request
19256eb7be5658503dcd7c7d6be8f953cde1d161153ff43252c9debd62bff047
transaction
3caa1870cd2b9f3f81e74ba9c0ff192b42d4fa88f6cac7c85d8d8c3bb87ebdbf
computed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 57815
recomputing…
the chainentry 57815
sealed to the entry before
a9698245f4fe6b4f5eb84c47a2bcec09db05f7a30b76543891df1c76cafea005
this leaf
5e87e12363597b8cc1625e9ee1c472b93c7456df3e07da1eb839889c0fcfdd0d
signed by
GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
signature
Ek0oMuymEi00E7mFDFcH9yknyVQ+F6Y3xATSmCS9nQGXoXOJHvsZdNUXVFecTWSoOrcVXFeC7zHBC8jjDNgMBQ==