why2 reasons
spend_windowspend_window_exceeded
this would take GBISQUAUYV4O6RBOUQ2WZFN6DS4JIR2XTP7BIIZJGWZSZJUC2WYIVTBG to 70 over the last 60000ms, above the 12 window cap, with 0 already spent
mandateamount_exceeds_cap
op 0 pays 70.0000000, cap is 40
what it was decided fromfingerprints
- rule compiled from it
- 996d3c8e59c0092bd21ad16962e74b3a0f8f8e339f42704f80ce7b4a91cde7f5
- request
- d7c8ece76e43fc92919d47ed40a2a26b68ff3ca987e6f17aaa43ce5d32a4e371
- transaction
- 359e409674b67a05d877758bb8b2eb079f150e93ca35d05f1d455963e847afdecomputed before submission, so a refusal has one too. this never settled.
verified in your browserentry 51329
the chainentry 51329
- sealed to the entry before
- e6fd26d6ef30a3e5931d7b3cf24f5e090d89eac10d7792f21d7c030d52ec290c
- this leaf
- 5f02859a16affb8433acecdc175f1d068f93784774c81591218e1bd70d53595b
- signed by
- GB6LRI3NHIMJT5CFHSFAVYB4YQLQXFQF34KMQY2KS263H2J6V6EO7L2S
- signature
- haCKx5D6VbOwZXrVlTJC8PNjvCosG3uNOXXxqrb1V+ekhPpqYtBE0xFqOBcExlEpuyzcNp5ZtIWiqSF7MHZOAw==